<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MirrorLess &#187; Olympus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mirrorless.net/category/olympus/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mirrorless.net</link>
	<description>blog about mirrorless cameras with interchangeable lens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>There is no problem with Olympus 14-42?</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/there-is-no-problem-with-olympus-14-42</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/there-is-no-problem-with-olympus-14-42#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14-42mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ep-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A problem with 14-42mm and Olympus EP-1 I mentioned earlier was reported by Imaging Resources but Andy Westlake at dpreview.com forum said he tested it and didn't concur on the findings.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/there-is-no-problem-with-olympus-14-42/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Explanation about ISO on new Olympus cameras</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/explation-about-iso-on-new-olympus-cameras</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/explation-about-iso-on-new-olympus-cameras#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ep-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a lot of talking on dpreview forums about ISO100 and ISo200 on new Olympus cameras - EP-1 included. DxO showed that there is no difference in amplification at ISO100 and ISO200 and that ISo higher than 100 are understated (ISo3200 is closer to ISo1600 for example).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/explation-about-iso-on-new-olympus-cameras/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting problem with Olympus EP-1 and 14-42mm</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/interesting-problem-with-olympus-ep-1-and-14-42mm</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/interesting-problem-with-olympus-ep-1-and-14-42mm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 19:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ep-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shutter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.wieze.org/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found on 43rumors.com interesting link to an article on Imaging Resource - <a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/EP1/EP1BLUR.HTM">here</a>. It's worth a read because it shows that mirrorless cameras can also be affected by "mirror blur"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/interesting-problem-with-olympus-ep-1-and-14-42mm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
