<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MirrorLess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mirrorless.net/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mirrorless.net</link>
	<description>blog about mirrorless cameras with interchangeable lens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-10-18</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-18</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-18#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
#Sony will make Cybershot with interchangeable lenses? http://bit.ly/ZDUQZ #
http://bit.ly/1OIopo - review of Panasonic GF1 on dpreview.com #
http://mirrorless.net/samsung-nx-new-photos - new photos of #Samsung #NX #

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-18/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung NX &#8211; new photos</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/samsung-nx-new-photos</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/samsung-nx-new-photos#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung nx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are new photos of Samsung NX and lenses for it on rumors page 43rumors.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/samsung-nx-new-photos/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panasonic GF1 &#8211; review on dpreview.com</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/panasonic-gf1-review-on-dpreview-com</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/panasonic-gf1-review-on-dpreview-com#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Micro Four Thirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GF1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic GF1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a review of Panasonic GF1 now on dpreview.com with great comparison to EP-1. Worth reading. Review is as always on dpreview very thorough with lots of comparisons. In conclusion the DR and JPEG output are worse than on EP-1, the AF is much faster, the RAW output is "stunning"!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/panasonic-gf1-review-on-dpreview-com/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumor: Sony mirrorless camera being tested right now!</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/rumor-sony-mirrorless-camera-being-tested-right-now</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/rumor-sony-mirrorless-camera-being-tested-right-now#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybershot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[m43rumors and sonyalpharumos published a rumor that Sony has already developed a compact mirrorless camera with interchangeable lenses and APS-C sensor! If it is true the camera is working and is being tested.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/rumor-sony-mirrorless-camera-being-tested-right-now/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-10-11</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-11</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
http://mirrorless.net/samsung-nx-video - video presenting new Samsung NX #
No problem with #Olympus 14-42 for #EP1? Dpreview.com member thinks so: http://bit.ly/8Q35f #
#Panasonic m4/3 cameras don&#39;t have the orientation sensor? http://bit.ly/avkBp #

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-11/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orientation sensor on Panasonic cameras in the lens only?</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/orientation-sensor-on-panasonic-cameras-in-the-lens-only</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/orientation-sensor-on-panasonic-cameras-in-the-lens-only#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ois]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks that way. On Panasonic Micro Four Thirds (and Four Thirds) cameras there is no orientation sensor - you need to attach lens with OIS (optical stabilization) to get correct orientation information in your photos.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/orientation-sensor-on-panasonic-cameras-in-the-lens-only/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is no problem with Olympus 14-42?</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/there-is-no-problem-with-olympus-14-42</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/there-is-no-problem-with-olympus-14-42#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14-42mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ep-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A problem with 14-42mm and Olympus EP-1 I mentioned earlier was reported by Imaging Resources but Andy Westlake at dpreview.com forum said he tested it and didn't concur on the findings.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/there-is-no-problem-with-olympus-14-42/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung NX &#8211; video</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/samsung-nx-video</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/samsung-nx-video#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung nx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video presenting Samsung NX camera.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/samsung-nx-video/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Weekly Updates for 2009-10-04</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-04</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-04#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-04</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I just started a blog - http://mirrorless.wieze.org - about cameras without mirror but with interchangeable lens - like Micro Four Thirds. #
http://bit.ly/cGij5 - how does #fuji #superccd #exr sensor work - short info #
Rumor: http://bit.ly/W25hL - #fuji will make a Micro Four Thirds body? #
http://bit.ly/4aIEg - about a problem with #olympus #EP-1 and 14-42mm lens [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2009-10-04/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuji in Micro Four Thirds &#8211; almost certain</title>
		<link>http://mirrorless.net/fuji-in-micro-four-thirds-almost-certain</link>
		<comments>http://mirrorless.net/fuji-in-micro-four-thirds-almost-certain#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 07:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnesus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fuji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micro Four Thirds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S10EXR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mirrorless.net/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many discussion on Dpreview forum about Fuji joining Micro Four Thirds and making S10EXR camera. There is at least one confirmation from source from Fujifilm company itself. So we just have to wait for official statement from Fuji.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mirrorless.net/fuji-in-micro-four-thirds-almost-certain/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
